Best practices

Now, what’s the best approach for catching data extraction errors?

Ideal: Have two people extract each study independently. Then compare their results and iron out any inconsistencies. If necessary, have a third person resolve any inconsistencies

Practical: Have one person extract each study, but use another reviewer to “spot check” the results, focusing on the most important data.

This is a case where the number of studies in your systematic review, your timeline, and your resources will play a role in your approach to quality control. If you have a manageable pile of studies, enough time and enough resources, you can devote two data extractors to each study.

Under a tighter deadline, or in a case where there’s an overwhelming amount of research to review, you’ll probably opt for the spot checking approach.

Congratulations! You now know how to extract data, build a form, address inconsistent data and create an approach for quality control.

It’s time to move on to the next step of conducting a systematic review: assess for risk of bias.

Now that you've finished our course, Extract Data, please fill out this survey to provide us with feedback on how we're doing and how we could improve. Thank you!

What was your level of experience with extracting data before you took this course?
After taking this course I feel confident in my ability to extract data
I think the content of this course was clear.
The forms helped me learn these concepts.
How likely would you be to recommend this course to a friend or colleague? Please specify why or why not.
Do you have any suggestions to help us improve this course?
No HTML was returned.